10 Best Clearbit Alternatives in 2026

Clearbit is still capable inside HubSpot, but teams are switching for reasons like:

• HubSpot lock-in. Breeze Intelligence is built for HubSpot; it is less useful outside it.
• No standalone product. The clearbit.com site now redirects to HubSpot marketing pages; there is no separate Clearbit SKU.
• Pricing changes. Enrichment is now bundled into HubSpot packaging and Breeze credit packs, sold through HubSpot sales.
• Declining match rates. Practitioners report lower fill rates than the standalone Clearbit of years past.
• API flexibility. Teams want a standalone enrichment API not tied to a CRM.

Enrich is the alternative we recommend first for teams leaving Clearbit over HubSpot lock-in and match-rate concerns. It runs waterfall enrichment across multiple providers, querying them in sequence per record and keeping the first verified result. Crucially, it is provider-agnostic and CRM-agnostic: you can write clean records back to Salesforce, HubSpot, or any system.

Pricing is transparent and credit-based, starting at $49/mo for 100K credits, with no HubSpot dependency, no annual contract, and 100 free trial credits. The standalone API and MCP server make it easy to embed enrichment in your own apps, pipelines, and AI agents — exactly the flexibility Clearbit's standalone API used to offer before the acquisition.

Clay orchestrates 150+ data providers in waterfall sequences with AI research and automation. Free: 500 actions + 100 credits/mo. After the March 2026 pricing change, Launch is $167/mo billed yearly ($185 monthly) for 15K actions + 2,500 data credits/mo; Growth $446/mo annual ($495 monthly) for 40K actions + 6K credits. Two-currency model: actions (platform operations) + data credits (per-provider charges).

Pros: Multi-provider, flexible workflows, free tier, published compliance program (SOC 2 / GDPR). Cons: Steep learning curve, total cost climbs with provider usage. See Clay vs Clearbit.

People Data Labs is a raw data API for developers. Free tier: 100 records/month (contact data obfuscated on free). Pro plan starts at $98/mo for 350 records/month with full APIs and contact data; annual billing offers a discount. PDL has publicly published SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO compliance information.

Pros: Developer-first, clean API, free tier for testing. Cons: Requires engineering, raw data is not turnkey, no built-in waterfall.

Apollo combines a broad database, enrichment, sequences, and a dialer on transparent pricing from $49/seat/mo (annual) or $59 monthly, plus an ongoing limited free tier. Broader scope than a pure enrichment API if you want prospecting and enrichment in one place.

Pros: All-in-one, free tier, public API. Cons: Marketing-enrichment depth varies, per-seat pricing model. See our best Apollo alternatives.

ZoomInfo offers deep enrichment, intent, and firmographics through its platform and API, for enterprise budgets. Custom pricing, annual contracts.

Pros: Deep data, Bombora intent, technographics. Cons: Expensive, opaque pricing. See our best ZoomInfo alternatives.

Cognism brings compliant European data and on-demand mobile verification to enrichment, a strong fit for EU-focused teams that found Clearbit US-leaning. Custom pricing, Standard and Pro tiers.

Pros: EU data, GDPR-first, Bombora intent. Cons: Custom pricing, no free plan. See our best Cognism alternatives.

FullContact specializes in identity resolution and enrichment, matching fragmented customer data into unified profiles. Products span identity unification, visitor recognition, and data append. Pricing is custom — the pricing page directs to a sales form. FullContact has been part of Ziff Davis's martech portfolio in recent years.

Pros: Identity resolution focus, enrichment API. Cons: Custom pricing only, narrower scope than a general enrichment platform.

Datagma offers real-time enrichment via API. Free tier (subject to current pricing-page terms): 3 mobile phones + 90 verified emails/year (10 seats). The Regular paid plan is listed at $39/mo billed yearly for 1,200 mobile phones + 36,000 verified emails/year. (Older articles cited ~$24/mo; that figure is no longer on the current pricing page.) Pricing typically uses 1 credit per email and 30 credits per mobile phone. Common integrations include HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zapier, Make, and n8n.

Pros: Affordable, real-time API, generous free tier, broad integration set. Cons: Smaller database than enterprise providers.

Lusha provides fast contact data with an extension and API. Free: 40 credits/mo. Paid: Starter $37.45/mo billed yearly ($49.90 monthly). Simpler than Clearbit for ad-hoc enrichment, but with per-seat credits and phone reveals now costing 10 credits via the web app (5 via API).

Pros: Easy, ongoing free tier, public API. Cons: Shallower depth, per-user credits, phone credit cost increased in 2025. See our best Lusha alternatives.

Lead411 pairs verified contacts with Bombora intent. Entry Spark plan $49/mo monthly (1,000 exports); annual $490/yr (12,000 exports + intent). API access available on higher tiers.

Pros: Intent + verified data, monthly billing. Cons: Smaller database.

• Want a provider-agnostic enrichment API? Choose Enrich.
• Want to build custom workflows? Clay or People Data Labs.
• Need enterprise depth and intent? ZoomInfo.
• Selling into Europe? Cognism.
• Want identity resolution? FullContact.