LeadMagic Pricing 2026: Pay-Per-Result Credit Tiers

LeadMagic's pricing is refreshingly simple: one credit pool, 15+ enrichment endpoints, one API key, and you only pay for results. Credits start at $0.0204 each on the entry tier and fall toward a $0.007 floor at high volume. This guide breaks down LeadMagic pricing in 2026, how the pay-per-result model works, what every plan includes, and where the per-credit math lands for developers and data teams.

LeadMagic's model is defined by four rules:

• One credit pool, 15+ endpoints. A single balance funds every enrichment type. You are not juggling separate email, phone, and company quotas; it is all one pool, spent per result.
• Pay per result. Credits are consumed on successful enrichment only, with zero charge on failed matches. Different endpoints consume different amounts: an email find is 1 credit, email validation is 0.25 credit, a company or profile lookup is 1 credit, a mobile number is 5 credits, and an employee-finder result is 0.05 credit. Check the per-endpoint costs in the docs when modeling usage.
• Named tiers with a declining per-credit rate. The published plans are Basic, Essential, and Growth, with higher Professional and Ultimate tiers above them. The per-credit rate falls as you buy more, from $0.0204 on Basic to $0.0165 on Essential to $0.0104 on Growth, bottoming out near the $0.007 floor at the top tiers.
• Credits roll over on paid tiers. Unused credits carry forward for up to two months on Essential and Growth, so there is little use-it-or-lose-it pressure. Basic resets each cycle.

Annual billing gives two months free, and there are no per-seat charges; credit pools are shared across the team with usage tracking.

Numbers above are pulled directly from the LeadMagic pricing page. The named tiers are billed annually at the per-month rates shown; monthly billing is higher. Above Growth, the Professional and Ultimate tiers carry larger allotments at lower per-credit rates toward the $0.007 floor, and Enterprise is billed upfront quarterly (starting around $2,490 per quarter) with guaranteed credit price locks. LeadMagic publishes 99.9% uptime and reports 3,000+ teams using the platform.

LeadMagic bundles its full capability on every plan, which is unusual:

• Full API, CLI, and MCP access on every plan, including Basic. The native MCP server lets AI agents like Claude and Cursor call enrichment directly.
• All 15+ endpoints through one API key: email finding, mobile number finding, company data, profile search, email validation, employee finder, job-change detection, and more.
• Team-ready shared pools with usage tracking and no per-seat fees, so a whole team draws from one balance (up to 20 seats on Essential).
• Pay-per-result billing with zero charge on failed matches, cancel-anytime, and credit rollover for up to two months on the paid tiers.

This is the LeadMagic thesis: enrichment as infrastructure. There is no heavy UI, no seat licensing, and no separate quotas, just a credit pool and an API.

Basic ($41/month annual, 24,000 credits)

24,000 credits a year at $0.0204 each, billed $490 annually, with full API, CLI, and MCP access and every endpoint. Basic is the developer on-ramp: enough to integrate the API, test enrichment quality on real records, and validate match rates, with standard rate limits and SLA targets. Because it includes the MCP server, you can wire it into an AI agent during evaluation. The one caveat is that Basic credits reset each cycle rather than rolling over.

Essential ($83/month annual, 60,000 credits)

60,000 credits a year at $0.0165 each, billed $990 annually. Essential is LeadMagic's most popular tier and the practical floor for active prospecting. It adds credit rollover for up to two months, team organization for up to 20 seats, native Clay, Apollo, Smartlead, and Zapier integrations, and priority rate limits and email support. For a scaling GTM team running steady enrichment, this is the tier that fits.

Growth ($208/month annual, 240,000 credits)

240,000 credits a year at $0.0104 each, billed $2,490 annually. Growth is built for high-volume outbound systems and agencies, with the highest API and MCP rate-limit tier, rollover, and a dedicated Slack support channel and success rep. At roughly half the per-credit cost of Basic, it is where the volume economics start to pay off.

Professional, Ultimate, and Enterprise

Above Growth, the Professional and Ultimate tiers carry larger credit allotments at lower per-credit rates that approach the $0.007 floor. Enterprise is billed upfront on a quarterly basis (starting around $2,490 per quarter) and adds guaranteed credit price locks for teams that want rate certainty at scale. These are the paths for high-volume data teams and platforms embedding enrichment.

LeadMagic's model is unusually clean, so the items below are mostly things to model rather than surprise fees:

1. 1Endpoints cost different credit amounts. A mobile-number lookup is 5 credits and a B2B-social-to-email is 5, versus 1 credit for an email find and 0.25 for a validation. Your real cost depends on your endpoint mix, so check per-endpoint credit costs before estimating.
2. 2The $0.007 figure is a floor, not the entry rate. Published per-credit pricing starts at $0.0204 on Basic and only approaches $0.007 at the top Professional and Ultimate tiers. Budget against the tier you will actually buy.
3. 3Basic credits reset each cycle. Rollover (up to two months) starts on Essential. If you want credits to carry forward, plan for Essential or higher.
4. 4It is API-first, not a UI prospecting tool. LeadMagic is built for developers and data teams. If you want a browsable database, a Chrome extension, and a campaign UI, this is not that product.
5. 5Annual commitment unlocks the two-months-free saving. Month-to-month is available but priced higher than the annual per-month rates shown.

To LeadMagic's credit, the usual gotchas (per-seat fees, API gated to enterprise, charges on failed matches) are all absent here.

LeadMagic competes most directly with Enrich on API-first, MCP-native enrichment with no per-seat fees, the same architecture for the same audience. Both are built for developers and AI agents rather than UI-driven sales reps. The difference is sourcing strategy: LeadMagic is a direct enrichment provider, while Enrich adds waterfall cascading across multiple sources with ICP scoring. For teams choosing between API-first enrichment providers, compare the endpoint coverage and per-credit economics directly.

LeadMagic is the right call for developers and data teams that want enrichment as infrastructure: a clean API, a native MCP server for AI agents, no per-seat fees, and a single pool across every endpoint. The pay-per-result model and the per-credit rate dropping to $0.0104 on Growth (and lower above it) make it genuinely cheap at volume, and the single-pool, all-endpoints design is easy to build against. Teams running high-volume cold calling on mobile data and platforms embedding enrichment both fit well.

LeadMagic is less of a fit when:

• You want a UI, not an API. There is no browsable database or campaign interface; non-technical reps will want a tool with a front end.
• You need waterfall enrichment across many sources with ICP scoring. A cascading platform like Enrich maximizes match rates by trying multiple sources per record and scoring fit.
• You want the lowest entry per-credit rate. LeadMagic's $0.007 floor only applies at the top tiers; at Basic you pay $0.0204 per credit, so a high credit allotment per dollar elsewhere can be cheaper for smaller buyers.

LeadMagic is one of the cleanest pay-per-result enrichment models on the market. One credit pool, 15+ endpoints, one API key, full API/CLI/MCP on every plan, and no per-seat fees remove almost every common pricing gotcha, and the per-credit rate dropping from $0.0204 on Basic to $0.0104 on Growth (and toward $0.007 above it) makes it genuinely cheap at volume. The published 99.9% uptime and 3,000+ teams back up the infrastructure positioning.

The trade-off is scope: LeadMagic is API-first and developer-focused, not a UI prospecting tool with a browsable database, and the $0.007 figure is a high-volume floor rather than the entry rate. If you want enrichment as infrastructure, it is excellent value. If you want waterfall cascading across many sources with ICP scoring, or a front end for non-technical reps, compare it against Enrich's pricing, which shares the API-first, MCP-native approach while adding multi-source waterfall enrichment.